“Problems cannot be solved with the same mindset that created them”
Honestly, I see people debate to win the argument instead of start working on in their own way, which might have contributed to resolution by now. I am putting my view on ‘violence against women’ blog, though I wish it should not have existed at all, at least after passing millions of years of human evolution.
Current Situation:
In general, world has limited resources not just by considering the greed of humans but also by the nature of existence and increasing population. We passed several stages of such situations in several ways. We passed stage in which people shared whatever available, few fought against wealthy, few looted for others and so on.
Now we are in a stage in which people want to possess materialistic things such as wealth, women, power either by the ability to manipulate or physical power. Because possessing with physical strength is quicker than earning it, people are tending to resort to it.
For such reasons, I would like to tweak it as Violence against people who are less physically strong so that we don’t get distracted. Now, the problem at hand is Violence against people who are less physically strong, so we eliminated false gender bias.
Let me give reason with an example why I eliminate such biases.
Example: Once an interviewee was asked for money as a bribe for offering a job. When one of the student leader associated with political party came to know this, he came to fight for him. Another student leader who is associated with NGO came to fight on his behalf.
When there is competition among such leaders, they find ways to get more attention and one such leader distorted whole scene to find that interviewee was from lower caste, and attached that to main issue of bribing. He might be getting more attention, and government might pass a rule to conduct interviews for lower caste more strictly/liberally.
Issue still persists but as issue was side tracked and root cause of the problem was not addressed at all.
What people think is best possible solution:
Few acted violently; we act more violently to achieve peace...‘War for peace’.
But “Problems cannot be solved with the same mindset that created them”
So amending laws to strictly punish is not the solution either for time being or for long term. Because, by killing you are indicating that people with high morals and intelligent to earn can only survive in society and rest have no place on earth. Such strict laws violence against women, or old, or lower caste, middle class, cheating, dacoiting, infidelity, wild animals, pets so on and so forth would keep on eliminating 1% of population per day on any day, at least :(
This is similar to Holocaust(6 million Jews were killed) on the name of survival of fittest!
Weak has to be killed because they can’t win war for them.
It is puzzle:
From such time period, we got a history tested frameworks/institution/system, which may take another few hundreds of years to experiment, and test an each framework/institution/system.
For example, agriculture practices (organic farming was left behind), institution of marriage (whole world looks at India for its better marriage institution), political framework, legal framework, religious processions, so on.
What puzzles me is when religion (no exception) which has defined set of rituals which asks people to follow with ease, people call following a religion as out of fashion but say killing humans(as a result of strong Violence against women Act) as well cultured ?
'(allegiance, except God, shall be to thy wife’. When this alone is practiced, I don’t think there would be 1% of crime reported now would exist)
I heard people saying, Hinduism has no logic or Islam is rigid or Jainism is ordinary and I wonder whether they know meaning of religion or did they read at least a page their own religious notes and try to understand the essence of it? To conclude whether god exists or not, know the who or what it is.
When Ramayan says Rama could not perform important ritual in the absence of in his wife and put statue made of pure golden pure gold to carry on with it.
Why do people can’t get away with essence of importance of wife/women to attain eternal happiness and end up in debating pure gold can't be used to make statues to conclude Ramayan is false?
When women were asked to cover their heads in Gurudwara, they don’t rationalise but try to disregard it as illogically enforcing but try enforce anti violence acts? (law is highest form of enforcement morally and physically)
When people can pursue their own choice for their happiness has to be norm Why people consider home making by women(for that matter by men) low when compared to doing a job?
Why do all women/men have to take up job to prove their worthiness when few/many have a choice?
Why should ultimate goal of being well settled (in terms of financial worthiness) call into the status of possessing a so called beautiful girl?
Why do people want to take care of their body to flaunt to lure rather than try being healthy?
When physical attractiveness should not bother men/women, how can husband/wife get attracted to their spouse? (Let’s not bring in high morals as whole world stoop so low)
Why do we call people who encourage advertisement/possessing physical characteristics are called educated?
When famous universities, such as Harward, Cambridge, etc, slowly test (no offence, flawless testing takes time under possible conditions available) and prove each thing good things of the past ideal times, why don’t we carry forward carefully the good we were passed on to amend it for the betterment of future generations?
Why do people dislike, complain, or rebel, fight for best solution and rationalize better institutions their elders have passed on to current generation ?
Why do people only debate, don't constructively criticize to arrive at better solution and expect someone from sky to correct others alone to make ideal world?
I mean:
Address the issue in two ways
1.Stopgap - immediately reducing crime rate (cautious, should not result in long term ill effects)
2. Permanent solution (creating a framework/system/institution, which would not even let people think of trying out of curiosity)
continued on other blog.
“Problems cannot be solved with the same mindset that created them”
1.Stopgap - immediately reducing crime rate (cautious, should not result in long term ill effects)
2. Permanent solution (creating a framework/system/institution, which would not even let people think of trying out of curiosity)
continued on other blog.
Comments
Post a Comment